Jenette Konopasek v. Douglas and Laura Konopasek

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that it was plain error not to merge the verdicts for first-degree 1 See State v. Wyatt, 331 Or 335, 341, 15 P3d 22 (2000) (“Generally, an issue not preserved in the trial court will not be considered on appeal.”); ORAP 5.45(1
• holding that it was plain error not to merge the verdicts for first-degree 1 See State v. Wyatt, 331 Or 335, 341, 15 P3d 22 (2000) (“Generally, an issue not preserved in the trial court will not be considered on appeal.”); ORAP 5.45(1
• holding that it was plain error not to merge the verdicts for first-degree 1 See State v. Wyatt, 331 Or 335, 341, 15 P3d 22 (2000) (“Generally, an issue not preserved in the trial court will not be considered on appeal.”); ORAP 5.45(1) (allowing discretionary review of “plain” errors
• holding that it was plain error not to merge the verdicts for first-degree 1 See State v. Wyatt, 331 Or 335, 341, 15 P3d 22 (2000) (“Generally, an issue not preserved in the trial court will not be considered on appeal.”); ORAP 5.45(1) (allowing discretionary review of “plain” errors
• accepting state concession and exercising discretion to correct trial court’s plain error in failing to merge guilty verdicts for second-degree sexual abuse and first-degree rape

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).