Jenetta W. Pickens v. The Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “requests for admissions as to central facts in dispute are beyond the proper scope of [Rule 36]”
• finding that a death certificate rebutted by its author and speculative to constitute more than adequate rebuttal
• requests for admissions as to central facts in dispute are beyond proper scope of rule providing that requested admissions shall be deemed admitted if not answered

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).