· 12/21/1984
Jeneski v. Myers
Citations
- 163 Cal. App. 3d 18
- 209 Cal. Rptr. 178
- 1984 Cal. App. LEXIS 2876
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “The initial cutback is indeed an across-the-board reduction in benefits mandated by state law and is not an individual denial thereof ... [and therefore] we do not believe that an evidentiary hearing prior to termination was mandatory.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Lui
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.