Skip to main content
· 12/21/1984

Jeneski v. Myers

Citations

  • 163 Cal. App. 3d 18
  • 209 Cal. Rptr. 178
  • 1984 Cal. App. LEXIS 2876

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “The initial cutback is indeed an across-the-board reduction in benefits mandated by state law and is not an individual denial thereof ... [and therefore] we do not believe that an evidentiary hearing prior to termination was mandatory.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lui

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.