Jeneski v. City of Worcester

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting “the settled constitutional rule that state agencies may pursue legitimate purposes by any means having a conceivable rational relationship to those purposes” (quoting Stern v. Tarrant County Hosp. Dist., 778 F.2d 1052, 1054 (5th Cir. 1985) (en banc))
• discussing the concepts of 2 reliance and transactional causation, i.e., the notion that 3 “but for the claimed misrepresentations or omissions, the 4 plaintiff would not have entered into the detrimental 5 securities transaction,” in the context of securities 6 fraud

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).