· 3/19/2007
Jencks v. Modern Woodmen of America
Citations
- 479 F.3d 1261
- 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 6302
- 89 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 42,740
- 100 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 307
- 2007 WL 807011
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Mere conjecture that the employer’s explanation is pretext is [an] insufficient basis to defeat summary judgment.” (internal quotation marks omitted)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Lucero, Ebel, O'Brien
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.