Skip to main content
· 3/19/2007

Jencks v. Modern Woodmen of America

Citations

  • 479 F.3d 1261
  • 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 6302
  • 89 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 42,740
  • 100 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 307
  • 2007 WL 807011

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Mere conjecture that the employer’s explanation is pretext is [an] insufficient basis to defeat summary judgment.” (internal quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lucero, Ebel, O'Brien

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.