Jeffrey v. Hays Plumbing & Heating

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that while workers cannot escape Section 52-1-26(D) by voluntarily remaining unemployed or underemployed, “[n]evertheless, it does not follow that the provisions of Section 52-1-26(D
• stating that while workers cannot escape Section 52-1-26(D) by voluntarily remaining unemployed or underemployed, “[njevertheless, it does not follow that the provisions of Section 52-1-26(D
• stating that “[w]e should not attribute to the [Legislature an undue precision in drafting and thereby frustrate legislative intent when we construe a statute”
• stating that 6 “[w]e should not attribute to the [L]egislature an undue precision in drafting and thereby frustrate legislative intent when we construe a statute”
• stating that to permit a worker to evade the requirements of another statute would be contrary to the Act

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).