Skip to main content
· 4/29/2003

Jeffrey v. Cathers

Citations

  • 104 S.W.3d 424
  • 2003 Mo. App. LEXIS 592
  • 2003 WL 1961639

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that the reversal of Jeffrey II necessitated the reversal of Jeffrey I because res judicata could not apply
  • filing of mechanic’s lien, standing alone, not absolutely privileged

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Dowd, Hoff, Draper

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.