Jeffrey T. Rosen v. Montgomery County Maryland, and Neal Potter, County Executive

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a municipality may be held vicariously liable for the actions of its employees or agents
• stating that the \decision to affirm . . . is based on . . . the lack of any discernible injury\
• stating that the “decision to affirm ... is based on ... the lack of any discernible injury”
• \Calling an... arrest a 'program or activity' of the County... strikes us as a stretch of the statutory language and of the underlying legislative intent.\
• “[C]alling a drunk driving arrest a ‘program or activity’ of the County, the ‘essential eligibility requirements’ of which (in this case) are weaving in traffic and being intoxicated, strikes us as a stretch of the statutory language and of the underlying legislative intent.”
• “[C]alling a drunk driving arrest a ‘program or activity’ of the County, the ‘essential eligibility requirements’ of which (in this case) are weaving in traffic and being intoxicated, strikes us as a stretch of the statutory language and of the underlying legislative intent.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).