Skip to main content
· 8/6/2012

Jeffrey Sherman v. Rinchem Company, Inc.

Citations

  • 687 F.3d 996
  • 34 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 243
  • 2012 WL 3155975
  • 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 16283

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that qualified privilege applies to “[cjommunications between an employer’s agents made in the course of investigating or punishing employee misconduct” (internal quotation marks omitted)
  • “[T]he authority to impose sanctions for spoliated evidence arises not from substantive law but, rather, from a court’s inherent power to control the judicial process.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Riley, Melloy, Smith

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.