JEFFREY RAY SUNDWALL v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the FAA required arbitration and expressly declining to determine 4 See, e.g., Robertson’s Ready Mix, Ltd. v. Edwards, No. 22-CV-1386, 2023 WL 3049228, at (C.D. Cal. Mar. 2, 2023
• holding that DSP agreement between Amazon and corporate plaintiff was not a “contract of employment” because “it did not promise work and compensation to an individual employee,” but required “certain business services to be provided by one business to another. . ..”
• finding that the plaintiff corporation did not qualify for the transportation worker exemption in part because it was “not some legal fiction existing only to shield Amazon from unwanted liabilities”
• finding that the plaintiff corporation did not qualify for the transportation worker exemption in part because it was “not some legal fiction existing only to shield Amazon from unwanted liabilities”
• relating not to individual employment but to business services provided to another business
• “plaintiff Amos is not a party to the Agreement — and so her central arguments that she was a ‘transportation worker’ and had a ‘contract of employment’ with Amazon fall completely flat.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).