Skip to main content
· 3/11/2026

Jeffrey Ray Sundwall v. State of Florida

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that § 924(c) does not facially violate Second Amendment because unlawful conduct it regulates falls outside scope of Second Amendment’s plain text
  • “There is not, for instance, an automatic companion rule allowing police to search the companions of any armed individual.”
  • “The purpose of voir dire is to ensure that the court is able to remove prospective jurors who may not be able to impartially follow the court's instructions and apply the law to the facts.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.