Jeffrey R. Minot, and Jeffrey R. Minot, as the Parent and Custodian of Stephen Rafael Minot v. Astrid Eckardt-Minot

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “section 1447(d) d[id] not bar appellate review” because “the District Court invoked abstention doctrines, rather than a jurisdictional defect, to justify its remand”
• “this Court found ‘particularly strong’ reasons for abstaining in a case involving a divorced couple's separation agreement, in part because New York courts had a continuing power to modify or enforce the agreement”
• “Thus, it would appear to be that rare case the Supreme Court had in mind when it suggested that ‘in certain circumstances, the abstention principles developed in Burford ... might be relevant in a case involving elements of the domestic relationship.’” (citation omitted)
• upholding the district court’s decision to abstain, however
• order appealable under collateral order doctrine
• order appealable under collateral order doctrine

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).