JEFFREY R. FERGUSON, — v. DONALD P. ROPER, —

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding no Youngblood violation when the undisclosed evidence “existed until long after the trial”
• addressing habeas petitioner’s claim that state de- stroyed exculpatory evidence during state postconviction proceedings and No. 24-cv-411 noting that Arizona v. Youngblood, 488 U.S. 51 (1988), “does not apply to ev- idence lost or destroyed until after trial”
• “[t¡he Supreme Court’s discussion in Crawford raises some doubt whether the Roberts reliability analysis remains good law when applying the Confrontation Clause to nontestimonial hearsay”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).