Jeffrey Paul Howe v. City of Enterprise

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding issues must be raised in trial court and parties will be held to theory upon which case was presented
• observing that application of the right-result-wrong-theory rule requires preservation of arguments supporting application of the correct legal theory
• ruling State has burden to demonstrate warrantless search fell within well-recognized exception to warrant requirement or was otherwise reasonable under circumstances
• finding the State argued consent below and therefore the plain-view doctrine argument not preserved on appeal
• explaining the term standing as “shorthand for the question [of] whether the moving party had a legitimate expectation of privacy . . . .” (citation omitted)
• explaining the term standing as “shorthand for the question [of] whether the moving party had a legitimate expectation of privacy . . . .” (citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).