Jeffrey P. Curtis and Martin A. Sax v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting “Apprendi is about nothing but procedure — who decides a given question (judge versus jury) and under what standard (preponderance versus reasonable doubt
• explaining that Apprendi announced procedural rule that does not apply retroactively
• “[A] person convicted of an act that the law does not make criminal may obtain collateral relief.”
• “Apprendi does not alter which facts have what legal significance”
• so concluding after Supreme Court’s decision in Cotton

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).