Skip to main content
· 10/17/2019

Jeffrey Nelson v. Julie A. Nelson (mem. dec.)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that omissions were immaterial because they were apparent from the face of the affidavit
  • “[A] controlled buy, when executed properly, is generally a reliable indicator as to the presence of illegal drug activity.” (citation and quotations omitted)
  • expressly approving of, in dicta, aggregating the weight of two quantities of “a mixture or substance containing fentanyl” under the enhanced-penalty provision of 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)(A)(vi)
  • “[C]ontrolled buys ordinarily go a long way to- ward establishing probable cause.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.