Jeffrey M. Scarabin v. Drug Enforcement Administration

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that government provided Notice of Seizure to claimant outlining alternatives available for contesting forfeiture
• remanding case to DEA because, despite opportunity, it failed to review merits of petitioner's claim
• DEA may not ignore citizen's response to seizure notice, even if technically in error, where response contains the necessary information
• DEA may not ignore citizen’s response to seizure notice, even if technically in error, where response contains the necessary information
• DEA may not ignore citizen's response to seizure notice, even if technically in error, where response contains the necessary information
• federal court may review agency's refusal to exercise jurisdiction over a claim as well as the nature of any procedural safeguards, but is precluded from reviewing the merits

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).