Jeffrey M. Louis, Dpm v. U.S. Department of Labor, an Executive Department of the United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding in the similar context of the Privacy Act that \judicial review is not limited to the justification for withholding of documents originally relied upon by the agency\
• declining to apply Chenery when Congress has instructed courts to review an action de novo
• finding Chenery inapplicable 25 where a court reviews agency action de novo
• \[R]eview of agency decisions under FOIA and the Privacy Act is de novo.\
• “Chenery I was premised on the policy that courts should not substitute their judgment for that of the agency when reviewing a ‘determination of policy or judgment which the agency alone is authorized to make and which it has not made.’”
• summary judgment in Privacy Act cases

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).