Skip to main content
· 9/14/2023

Jeffrey M. Hill v. Murray American Energy

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the privilege does not forbid the asking of questions that likely precipitate incrimination
  • holding that the privilege does not forbid the asking of questions that likely precipitate incrimination
  • stating that a target appearing before a grand jury does not have a Sixth Amendment right to counsel
  • stating that a target appearing before a grand jury does not have a Sixth Amendment right to counsel
  • characterizing the grant of immunity as the government’s “ultimate tool for securing testimony that would otherwise be protected”
  • characterizing immunity as “the quid pro quo for securing an answer from the witness”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.