Skip to main content
· 11/4/2020

Jeffrey Humphrey v. Richard Deal

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that plaintiffs need only demonstrate a “good faith, objectively reasonable belief” that the activity was statutorily protected
  • holding that the law, rule, or regulation violation standard is satisfied if the employee shows she had a “good faith, objectively reasonable belief that h[er] activity [was] protected by the statute”
  • finding the phrase “any other compensatory damages allowable at law” authorized noneconomic compensatory damages under the private sector act
  • finding the phrase “any other compensatory damages allowable at law” authorized noneconomic compensatory damages under the private sector act
  • requiring only a 2 QuantiTech’s motion to dismiss focuses on whether it qualifies as Mr. Briggs’ employer under the Florida Whistleblower Act. (Doc. 55 at 16–17
  • requiring only a good-faith, objectively reasonable belief that the defendant violated the law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.