Jeffrey G. Harden v. Roadway Package Systems, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that \[t]he district court lacked the authority to compel arbitration... because the FAA is inapplicable to [employees] who are engaged in interstate commerce\
• holding that “[t]he district court lacked the authority to compel arbitration ... because the FAA is inapplicable to [employees] who are engaged in interstate commerce”
• holding that delivery driver for predecessor company of FedEx fell within the § 1 exemption even though there was no indication the driver himself actually crossed state lines
• concluding that a “delivery driver” was a transportation worker
• plaintiff engaged to “provid[e] a small package information, transportation and delivery service throughout the United States”
• “Since the FAA is inapplicable to this case, the district court lacked the substantive legal authority to compel 21 arbitration.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).