JEFFREY E. BINDER v. STATE OF FLORIDA

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the invited-error bar “is triggered only by unambiguous statements or representa- tions”
• “Administrative feasibility does not follow from the text of Rule 23(a). . . . Nor does a requirement of administrative feasibility follow from Rule 23(b).”
• a district court retains CAFA jurisdiction even after it denies class certification
• “membership can be capable of determination without being capable of convenient determination”
• “[A]dministrative feasibility is not a requirement for certification under Rule 23.”
• “Class representatives bear the burden to establish that their proposed class is adequately defined and clearly ascertainable, and they must satisfy this requirement before the district court can consider whether the class satisfies the enumerated prerequisites of Rule 23(a

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).