Jeffrey Colbath v. Estate of Zale Dudas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that trial court did not abuse its discretion by excluding prospective juror who equivocated as to whether he could consider death penalty
• Apprendi and the reasonable doubt standard apply only to factual findings, not to the weighing of aggravators and mitigators
• District Court ad- mitted evidence of defendant’s “likely role in the disappear- ance (and presumably murder) of three other people”
• District Court ad- mitted evidence of defendant’s “likely role in the disappear- ance (and presumably murder) of three other people”
• District Court ad- mitted evidence of defendant’s “likely role in the disappear- ance (and presumably murder) of three other people”
• Apprendi and the reasonable doubt standard apply only to factual findings, not to the weighing of aggravators and mitigators

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).