· 2/10/1999
Federal Case
Citations
- 168 F.3d 1069
- 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 1921
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- regarding whether the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota properly enjoined Minneapolis Public Housing Authority’s (MPHA
- “We repeat the fundamental principle that the ultimate merits of the case have no bearing on the threshold question of standing.”
- “We repeat the fundamental principle that the ultimate merits of the case have no bearing on the threshold question of standing.”
- “We repeat the fundamental principle that the ultimate merits of the case have no bearing on the threshold question of standing.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.