Skip to main content
· 2/10/1999

Federal Case

Citations

  • 168 F.3d 1069
  • 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 1921

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • regarding whether the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota properly enjoined Minneapolis Public Housing Authority’s (MPHA
  • “We repeat the fundamental principle that the ultimate merits of the case have no bearing on the threshold question of standing.”
  • “We repeat the fundamental principle that the ultimate merits of the case have no bearing on the threshold question of standing.”
  • “We repeat the fundamental principle that the ultimate merits of the case have no bearing on the threshold question of standing.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.