Jeffrey Ames Hughes v. James Mathews, Warden

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “we conclude that in Wisconsin psychiatric testimony is relevant evidence on issues regarding a defendant’s mental state including the question of whether the defendant had the capacity to form specific intent as opposed to general intent.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).