Jeffery v. Sauseda

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that even if we assumed that the predecessor to La. R.S. 22:868 voided a group ERISA plan's choice of law provision, the claimant had not raised a fact issue regarding whether the policy was issued and delivered in Massachusetts
• declining to apply the predecessor to La. R.S. 22:868 when the claimant had not raised an issue of fact over the policy being issued and delivered in Massachusetts
• affirming dismissal with prejudice where the plaintiff failed to allege any discriminatory acts occurring within the forty-five-day period preceding his initial contact with an Equal Employment Opportunity Counselor as required by 29 C.F.R. § 1614.105(a)(1)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).