Jefferson Wayne Bourgeois v. State of Florida

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the debt-collection exception insufficiently tailored to advance the government’s interests in protecting privacy
• finding that ACA Int’l “wipe[d] the definitional slate clean,” and 4 overturned the preceding FCC regulations interpreting § 227(a)(1)
• confirming that Marks’s construction of the ATDS definition “clarif[ied] any ambiguity” about the provision after ACA International “wipe[d] the definitional slate clean”
• finding that 3 A law is underinclusive when it abridges “too little speech,” Williams-Yulee v. Florida Bar, 135 S. Ct. 1656, 1668 (2015) (emphasis in original
• agreeing with the Fourth Circuit and holding that the 1991 autodialing ban coupled with the 2015 government-debt exception failed strict scrutiny
• striking down the TCPA’s government- debt exception as unconstitutional, but severing it

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).