Jefferson County Sheriff's Department v. Daniels

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The ‘act’ that is contemplated by Rule 12.6 is necessarily, therefore, the rendering of a decision.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Davis v. Blackstock
  Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama· 2013-04-05· cited 4×
• Pierson v. Jefferson County Personnel Board
  Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama· 2010-08-27· cited 1×
• Southern Union State v. Salatto, 2091201 (ala.civ.app. 10-7-2011)
  Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama· 2011-10-07
• Key v. City of Irondale (Ex parte Key)
  Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama· 2017-07-14
• Tarik Yahia Farrag, M.D. v. Cynthia Diane Dennis Thomas
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 2023-02-17

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Home Indem. Co. v. Anders
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 1984-09-14· cited 69×
• Personnel Bd. of Jefferson County v. Bailey
  Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama· 1985-05-22· cited 41×
• Ex Parte Personnel Bd. of Jefferson County
  Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama· 1987-07-15· cited 15×
• Copeland v. Personnel Bd. of Jefferson County
  Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama· 1986-11-05· cited 6×
• Ex Parte City of Birmingham
  Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama· 2008-04-18· cited 5×