Skip to main content
· 5/30/1991

Jefferson County School District No. 509-J v. Fair Dismissal Appeals Board

Citations

  • 812 P.2d 1384
  • 311 Or. 389
  • 1991 Ore. LEXIS 36

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that agency erroneously interpreted the term “duty” and affirming Court of Appeals decision to remand to agency under the APA “to apply the proper interpretation of ‘duty’”
  • concluding that agency erroneously interpreted the term “duty” and affirming Court of Appeals decision to remand to agency under the APA “to apply the proper interpretation of ‘duty’ but see Dearborn v. Real ”
  • reversing FDAB’s order because the agency’s “explanation did not support its conclusion that dismissal was an unreasonable and clearly excessive sanction”
  • affirming Court of Appeals decision to remand order reversing dismissal of a school teacher to Fair Dismissal Appeals Board “to apply the proper interpretation of ‘duty’ and, in the light of that interpretation, to reconsider whether [the teacher] had neglected a duty she owed”
  • affirming Court of Appeals decision to remand order reversing dismissal of a school teacher to Fair Dismissal Appeals Board “to apply the proper interpretation of ‘duty’ and, in the light of that inter- pretation, to reconsider whether [the teacher] had neglected a duty she owed”
  • erroneous conception of teacher’s duty which permeated agency’s sanction analysis was legal error requiring remand

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Peterson, Carson, Gillette, Van Hoomissen, Fadeley, Unis

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.