Jefferies v. Phillips

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating the element of effect on public interest \must be proved by specific facts\
• “The mere proof that the actor is still alive and engaged in the same business is not sufficient to establish this element.”
• “[C]onduct which only affects the parties to the transaction provides no basis for a [SCUPTA] claim.”
• “In the course of human endeavor, every action has some potential for repetition. The mere proof that the actor is still alive and engaged in the same business is not sufficient to establish this element.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).