Skip to main content
· 7/8/1890

Jefferies v. Allen

Citations

  • 33 S.C. 268
  • 11 S.E. 764
  • 1890 S.C. LEXIS 137

Syllabus

<p>Pending an appeal from a decree which refused dower demanded by a widow, the lands in which the dower was claimed were sold under this decree, there being no exception to the directions as to sale nor objection made when the sale was had. The appeal was sustained and the widow’s right to dower affirmed.- A writ in dower was then issued under order of the court, which disregarding the requirements of the law as to such writs, directed the commissioners not to set oft dower in kind in the lands which had been sold, but to appraise the value of such lands. Held, that this order, and the writ issued in pursuance thereof, and all proceedings thereunder, were erroneous.</p>

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • overruled on other grounds by Kinchion v. State, 81 P.3d 681 , 687 (Okla. Crim. App. 2003)
  • “[T]he critical inquiry is whether the case involves ‘alternative means’ or ‘multiple acts.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McGowan, McIver, Simpson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.