· 10/29/1982
Jeep Corp. v. Second Judicial District Court
Citations
- 652 P.2d 1183
- 98 Nev. 440
- 1982 Nev. LEXIS 497
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing that although mandamus is not appropriate in the face of effective alternative remedies, extraordinary relief may be granted where the circumstances reveal urgency or a strong necessity
- where circumstances reveal urgency or strong necessity, extraordinary relief may be granted
- where circumstances reveal urgency or strong necessity, extraordinary relief may be granted
- \[N]either mandamus or prohibition is appropriate in the face of effective alternative remedies.\
- “The only difference between subsection (i) and subsection (ii
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Steffen, Gunderson, Manqukian, Springer, Zenoff
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.