Skip to main content
· 10/29/1982

Jeep Corp. v. Second Judicial District Court

Citations

  • 652 P.2d 1183
  • 98 Nev. 440
  • 1982 Nev. LEXIS 497

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that although mandamus is not appropriate in the face of effective alternative remedies, extraordinary relief may be granted where the circumstances reveal urgency or a strong necessity
  • where circumstances reveal urgency or strong necessity, extraordinary relief may be granted
  • where circumstances reveal urgency or strong necessity, extraordinary relief may be granted
  • \[N]either mandamus or prohibition is appropriate in the face of effective alternative remedies.\
  • “The only difference between subsection (i) and subsection (ii

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Steffen, Gunderson, Manqukian, Springer, Zenoff

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.