Skip to main content
· 6/17/1991

Jedlicka v. JSPOL Investors Corp.

Citations

  • 174 A.D.2d 652
  • 571 N.Y.S.2d 513
  • 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8648

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing neither Board nor courts have authority to recognize equitable exceptions to penalty provisions for voluntary failure to depart
  • recognizing neither Board nor courts have authority to recognize equitable exceptions to penalty provisions for voluntary failure to depart
  • recognizing neither BIA nor courts have authority to create equitable exceptions to penalty provisions for failure to depart voluntarily
  • holding that the Lozada framework applies to accredited representatives
  • granting a motion to reopen where an alien adequately complied with Matter of Lozada
  • Congress has not given BIA authority to apply equitable exceptions to civil penalties for failing to depart within time for voluntary departure

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.