Jedco Development Co., Inc. v. Bertsch

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “a lessee is not relieved of his obligation to pay rent merely because he has assigned the lease with the lessor’s consent ... rather, the lessor must intend to release the lessee”
• summary judgment in favor of lessor in suit against lessee for rent after assignee defaulted reversed because genuine issue of material fact existed as to whether lessor, by changing terms of lease, intended to create new contract with assignee

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Rosenberg v. Son, Inc.
  North Dakota Supreme Court· 1992-10-06· cited 9×
• Schmitt v. Berwick Township
  North Dakota Supreme Court· 1992-07-28· cited 7×
• St. Louis Twin Oaks Associates I, L.P. v. Executive Office Network, Ltd.
  E.D. Missouri· 1992-10-09· cited 1×

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Walker v. Rednalloh Co.
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1938-03-02· cited 23×
• Herb Hill Insurance, Inc. v. Radtke
  North Dakota Supreme Court· 1986-01-22· cited 19×
• Tony & Leo, Inc. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1979-07-20· cited 13×
• Keeley v. Beenblossom
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 1918-05-20· cited 11×
• Holman v. State
  North Dakota Supreme Court· 1989-03-28· cited 9×
• Benjamin v. Benjamin
  North Dakota Supreme Court· 1989-04-19· cited 7×
• Butler v. Roberts
  North Dakota Supreme Court· 1989-03-21· cited 6×
• Bayou Accept. Corp. v. Superior Hydraulics
  Louisiana Court of Appeal· 1984-03-07· cited 6×
• Cane River Shopping Center v. Monsour
  Louisiana Court of Appeal· 1983-08-15· cited 5×
• Groner v. Dryer
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1969-08-26· cited 5×
• Shooman v. McAughan
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1966-06-10· cited 2×