Jeannette Corporation v. National Labor Relations Board

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding an employer’s rule prohibiting wage discussion among employees “prima facie violative of [the NLRA]” because “higher wages are a frequent objective of organizational activity, and discussions about wages are necessary to further that goal”
• in enforcing Board’s order, court noted that discord generated by what employees perceived to be unjustified wage differentials provided basis for persistent concerted activity
• “Rules governing the conduct of employ- ees on company time and property are often necessary and an employer has a right to main- tain them.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).