· 7/8/1985
Jeanne Patterson v. Dietze, Inc.
Citations
- 764 F.2d 1145
- 1986 A.M.C. 751
- 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 30829
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that numerous telephone calls from defendant to forum are insufficient to support specific jurisdiction
- holding that there was no claim-specific jurisdiction because the material performance under the contract was performed in Mexico
- holding that numerous telephones calls from defendant to forum are insufficient to support specific jurisdiction
- holding that defendant making telephone calls to Texas, wiring payments to Texas, and entering into contracts with two Texas entities was insufficient contacts with Texas to establish personal jurisdiction
- holding that a defendant’s acts of making telephone calls to Texas, wiring payments to Texas, and entering into contracts with two Texas entities were insufficient contacts with Texas to establish personal jurisdiction
- holding that a defendant’s acts of making telephone calls to Texas, wiring payments to Texas, and entering into contracts with two Texas entities were insufficient contacts with Texas to establish personal jurisdiction
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Gee, Tate, Higgin-Botham
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.