Skip to main content
· 7/8/1985

Jeanne Patterson v. Dietze, Inc.

Citations

  • 764 F.2d 1145
  • 1986 A.M.C. 751
  • 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 30829

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that numerous telephone calls from defendant to forum are insufficient to support specific jurisdiction
  • holding that there was no claim-specific jurisdiction because the material performance under the contract was performed in Mexico
  • holding that numerous telephones calls from defendant to forum are insufficient to support specific jurisdiction
  • holding that defendant making telephone calls to Texas, wiring payments to Texas, and entering into contracts with two Texas entities was insufficient contacts with Texas to establish personal jurisdiction
  • holding that a defendant’s acts of making telephone calls to Texas, wiring payments to Texas, and entering into contracts with two Texas entities were insufficient contacts with Texas to establish personal jurisdiction
  • holding that a defendant’s acts of making telephone calls to Texas, wiring payments to Texas, and entering into contracts with two Texas entities were insufficient contacts with Texas to establish personal jurisdiction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gee, Tate, Higgin-Botham

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.