Skip to main content
· 5/22/1981

Jeanne HARRINGTON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. VANDALIA-BUTLER BOARD OF EDUCATION Et Al., Defendants-Appellees

Citations

  • 649 F.2d 434
  • 25 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1257
  • 31 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 1653
  • 1981 U.S. App. LEXIS 13000
  • 26 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 31,858

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “[a] mere showing that the second litigation, if allowed to proceed, would produce a different result” is not sufficient to exempt a case from res judi-cata principles
  • concluding that Chicot County Drainage District v. Baxter State Bank, 308 U.S. 371, 375, 60 S.Ct. 317, 84 L.Ed. 329 (1940), provides the better rule
  • concluding that Chicot County Drainage District v. Baxter State Bank, 308 U.S. 371, 375 (1940), provides the better rule
  • individual school board members not in privity with defendant school board in subsequent action
  • A Section 1983 action was barred by claim preclusion even though the plaintiff maintained it was “unavailable” to her in the first action
  • “A District Court’s failure to comply with the ten-day requirement of Rule 56(c) is subject to the harmless error rule.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Edwards, Engel, Martin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.