Jeanlouis v. Kajun Truck Plaza, L.L.C.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that knowledge of falsity, either constructive or actual, need not be proven to establish a CUTPA violation
• stating that, under General Statutes § 42-110a , a CUTPA claim must be based on acts and practices in the conduct of any trade or commerce
• knowledge of falsity, either constructive or actual, need not be proven to establish CUTPA violation
• knowledge of falsity, either constructive or actual, need not be proven to establish CUTPA violation
• “[i]t is now well established that CUTPA proscribes a broader range of conduct than did the common law action for innocent misrepresentation”
• knowledge of falsity, either constructive or actual, need not be proven to establish CUTPA violation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).