Jean v. Stanley

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Where there is no substantial burden, there is no ground to apply the ‘compelling interest’ test, and thus no RFRA violation—no matter how dire the practical consequences of a government policy or decision.”
• “[A] law is not ‘generally applicable’ if the law ‘impose[s] burdens only on conduct motivated by religious belief’ in a ‘selective manner.’” (second brackets in original) (quoting 8 Church of the Lukumi Babalu Aye, Inc. v. City of Hialeah, 508 U.S. 520, 533, 543 (1993))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).