Jean Patou, Inc. v. Theon, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that classification is for the convenience of the Office and “wholly irrelevant to the issue of registrability under section 1052(d), which makes no reference to classification”
• noting that the holding of Pinholster is also applicable 10 to § 2254(d)(2) claims
• “We will not manufacture arguments for an appellant, and a bare 10 assertion does not preserve a claim, particularly when, as here, a host of other issues are presented 11 for review”
• “delay is but a single factor to consider in evaluating 10 irreparable injury.”
• “Trademark ownership results only from use, not from registration.”
• “Trademark ownership results only from use, not from registration.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).