Jean-Laurent v. Wilkerson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a second strip search of an inmate-conducted after the inmate was previously strip searched, handcuffed, and escorted to another location-was unreasonable
• concluding that the plaintiff sufficiently alleged that a strip search was unreasonable where “the verbal and physical abuse that allegedly accompanied the strip search support[ed] a finding that the search was designed to harass and intimidate
• concluding that the plaintiff sufficiently alleged that the strip search was unreasonable because “the verbal and physical abuse that allegedly accompanied the strip search support[ed] a finding that the search was designed to harass and intimidate
• granting a motion to dismiss plaintiff's failure to intervene claims where the alleged use of force was too rapid for the defendants to have a realistic opportunity to intervene
• citing, inter alia, Covino v. Patrissi, 967 F.2d 73, 79 (2d Cir. 1992)
• “verbal intimidation does not rise to the level of a constitutional violation”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).