Skip to main content
· 10/12/1983

J.E. Hoetger & Co. v. Ascencio

Citations

  • 572 F. Supp. 814
  • 1983 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12841

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • rejecting “paternalistic” argument that broker “should have protected [investor] from his own greed”
  • Available on WESTLAW, FSEC-CFTC data-base

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Feikens

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.