· 10/12/1983
J.E. Hoetger & Co. v. Ascencio
Citations
- 572 F. Supp. 814
- 1983 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12841
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- rejecting “paternalistic” argument that broker “should have protected [investor] from his own greed”
- Available on WESTLAW, FSEC-CFTC data-base
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Feikens
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.