JDH Mgt. Group, L.L.C. v. Pierce
Citations
- 2018 Ohio 706
Syllabus
The trial court properly denied a home builder's motion for judgment on the pleadings because the parties' repayment agreement was not a novation of the construction contract. The trial court abused its discretion in denying the builder's motion to stay the homeowners' counterclaims pending arbitration.
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- claims of a non-party to a contract being solely responsible for contractual obligations requires showing clear and definite intent to extinguish the original contracting party’s obligations
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: M. Powell
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- AAAA Enterprises, Inc. v. River Place Community Urban Redevelopment Corp.Ohio Supreme Court· 1990-04-18· cited 1,562×
- Williams v. Aetna Finance Co.Ohio Supreme Court· 1998-11-04· cited 480×
- ABM Farms, Inc. v. WoodsOhio Supreme Court· 1998-04-29· cited 330×
- Corporex Development & Construction Management, Inc. v. Shook, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court· 2005-10-26· cited 122×
- Whaley v. Franklin County Board of CommissionersOhio Supreme Court· 2001-08-22· cited 105×
- In re Adoption of McDermittOhio Supreme Court· 1980-07-31· cited 96×
- Federal Land Bank v. TaggartOhio Supreme Court· 1987-05-27· cited 28×
- Bank of Am. v. SmithOhio Court of Appeals· 2014-06-30· cited 3×
- Patrick v. Dixie Imports, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2017-12-18· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.