Skip to main content
· 1/16/2020

JD Lawrence Perkins v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a forum selection clause that in effect precluded class actions was unenforceable
  • holding that a forum selection clause that in effect precluded class actions was unenforceable
  • holding that a forum selection clause that in effect precluded class actions was unenforceable
  • noting that a forum-selection clause which seriously impairs a plaintiff's ability to enforce consumer protection laws violates state public policy
  • finding that a forum selection clause violated public policy because it\seriously impaired] a plaintiff's ability to bring suit to enforce\the Washington Consumer Protection Act, ch. 19.86 RCW
  • finding that a forum selection clause violated public policy because it “seriously impair[ed] a plaintiff’s ability to bring suit to enforce” the Washington Consumer Protection Act, ch. 19.86 RCW

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.