JCG v. Dept. of Children and Families

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that where no findings of fact are provided to support the adjudication of dependency, the matter must be remanded with instructions to the trial court to provide such findings
• holding that although there was sufficient evidence to support a finding of dependency, failure to include sufficient facts in the order to support the adjudication of dependency required that the matter be remanded with instructions to the trial court to provide such findings
• “The father’s argument that section 39.01(1) of the Florida Statutes which defines ‘abandonment’ is unconstitutionally vague and overbroad is also rejected.”
• while there was sufficient evidence to support a finding of dependency, Florida law mandates that, where no findings of fact are provided to support the adjudication of dependency, the matter must be remanded with instructions to the trial court to provide such findings

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).