JCASA, Ltd. v. Dean
Citations
- 2021 Ohio 380
Syllabus
Objections to a magistrate's decision Civ.R. 53(D)(4)(d) breach of contract accord and satisfaction. The trial court did not abuse its discretion when it overruled the defendant's objections to the magistrate's recommendation. The trial court's judgment entry does not need to include a detailed explanation to show that the trial court engaged in an independent review of the record. Neither party made an argument about accord and satisfaction at trial.
Judges: Boyle
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Huffman v. Hair Surgeon, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court· 1985-08-09· cited 830×
- State ex rel. Dewine v. AshworthOhio Court of Appeals· 2012-11-29· cited 26×
- Barrientos v. BarrientosOhio Court of Appeals· 2011-11-07· cited 19×
- Pietrantano v. PietrantanoOhio Court of Appeals· 2013-09-30· cited 17×
- In re C.K.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2013-10-11· cited 15×
- Millers v. KasnettOhio Court of Appeals· 2015-01-29· cited 8×
- Van Dress Law Offices Co., L.L.C. v. DawsonOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-10-05· cited 6×
- Eye v. Sal's Heating & Cooling, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2020-12-17· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.