JC Pool & Spa, Inc. v. Oren

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that, where a prisoner was not brought to trial within the speedy trial period after receipt of his UMDDA request, his UMDDA rights were violated
• concluding that, where a prisoner was not brought to trial within the speedy trial period after receipt of his UMDDA request, his UMDDA rights were violated
• when prosecution received defendant's motion to dismiss under the UMD-DA, prosecution had notice of defendant's request to invoke the UMDDA
• “[E]ven when in county jail [the parolee-defendant] was in the custody of the department of corrections within the meaning of [the UMDDA].”
• \[Elven when in county jail [the parolee-defendant] was in the custody of the department of corrections within the meaning of [the UMD-DAJ.\
• failure to deliver the request to prison officials for processing does not defeat substantial compliance with the UMDDL where the prosecutor had actual notice of the request and did not act on it

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).