Skip to main content
· 11/26/1999

JC Penney v. Lane

Citations

  • 3 P.3d 1033
  • 197 Ariz. 113
  • 309 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 24
  • 1999 Ariz. App. LEXIS 199

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating the proper court for renewing a judgment is “the superior court in the same county in which the [transcript] judgment was docketed”
  • filing of a renewal affidavit “in a superior court in a county different from that in which its judgment was docketed, ... did not provide reasonable notice to interested persons of the status of the judgment and cannot be considered a correctable error[ ]”
  • failure to meet any of the four factors or the lack of extraordinary circumstances constitutes grounds to deny relief
  • “Courts have now been given discretion to extend the time for appeal upon a party’s showing of the bare failure to receive the clerk’s notice without its having to show additionally the compelling circumstances or any other circumstances provided in Rule 60(c
  • “Courts have now been given discretion to extend the time for appeal upon a party’s showing of the bare failure to receive the clerk’s notice without its having to show additionally the compelling circumstances or any other circumstances provided in Rule 60(c

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Grant, Weisberg, Ryan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.