J&C Investments v. Mid-South Drilling, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the plaintiff shareholders could not bring a direct action when one of the reasons for requiring derivative actions applied, which was to protect corporate creditors
• concluding that an employer’s conduct was not extreme and outrageous when the employer accused an employee of misappropriating funds and forgery, fired the employee, and reported the alleged crimes to the police
• holding that the plaintiff failed to demonstrate sufficiently severe emotional distress where the plaintiff did not “provide any evidence that the defendants’ conduct caused him to take medication or seek medical or psychological help.”
• accusations of forgery, followed by termination and removal from premises was insufficient to constitute IIED

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).