JBG/Twinbrook Metro Ltd. Partnership v. Wheeler

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “the interpretation of a written contract is ordinarily a question of law for the court.”
• noting that language in COMAR 26,10.11.01—“[t]he Department incorporates by reference the provisions contained in 40 CFR §§ 280.90-280.116”—was sufficient to incorporate by reference
• noting that language in COMAR 26.10.11.01—\[t]he Department incorporates by reference the provisions contained in 40 CFR §§ 280.90-280.116\—was sufficient to incorporate by reference
• stating that an “ ‘appellate court must view a case in a way that reconciles the jury’s verdicts if at all possible.’ ” (citation omitted)
• “[T]he interpretation of a written contract is ordinarily a question of law for the court.”
• \The interpretation of a written contract is ordinarily a question of law for the court.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).